Are we wrong to expect the Royal Family to be good role models? It’s a question that seems to surface every time a scandal or misstep finds its way into the headlines. The truth is, the Royal Family live in a strange tension between privilege and duty. They’re not elected, yet they represent the nation. They’re not ordinary citizens, yet they live under a scrutiny that few of us could bear.

It’s natural, then, that we expect them to embody qualities like dignity, integrity, service, and compassion. They’re woven into the fabric of our national identity, and many people look to them as symbols of continuity and moral steadiness in uncertain times. We want them to be a source of pride, an example of grace under pressure.

But perhaps the question isn’t whether we should expect them to be role models, but whether it’s realistic to expect them to always be so. After all, they’re human, flawed, complicated, sometimes wounded by the very system they were born into. When they fall short, their failings aren’t just personal; they’re public, dissected and amplified for the world to see.

Jesus once said, From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded (Luke 12:48). The Royals have indeed been given much (wealth, privilege, and a platform) but also responsibility, scrutiny, and the burden of expectation. So no, we’re not wrong to hope for goodness and humility in those who represent us. But maybe the true test of character isn’t perfection, it’s how they respond when they stumble.

Role models, after all, aren’t those who never fall. They’re the ones who get up again, a little wiser, a little kinder, and perhaps a little more human. Maybe, we all need to strive to be role models.